The fact of her appointment as a judge flies directly in the face of the goals of Mrs. Handó Tünde the President of the National Office of Judges(NOJ) published on the official site of Capital Court during an interview:
"Madam
President, how do you assess the past first half of the year?
First of all, I would like to underline that our
aim in the Office is not only to fulfil the general duties specified in the
law. All the workflows and programmes serve the purpose of the implementation
of our strategic goals. These goals include the operation of the courts by
fulfilling their constitutional duties, i.e. that high quality judgements shall
be passed in due time by independent judges. Another aim is to distribute and
utilise the human resources and to secure the material conditions within the
organisation in an optimal way. It is also important to improve the integrity
of the courts’ structure by providing for the transparency and the
calculability of the judicial and the administrative work, controlling the
administration, and by guaranteeing the security of the judges." Source: http://birosag.hu/engine.aspx?page=Birosag_english - official site of the Capital Court in Budapest
Our first public question to the President of the National Office of Judges - Mrs. Handó Tünde is:
Dear Madame President!
In the law there are several conditions dr. Takacs Eszter does not meet, i.e. one can not be appointed as judge if there is either ongoing criminal or disciplinary procedure, f) and g) of paragraph 4. of 2011:CLXII.
Have you and if yes, how have you checked the eligibility of dr. Takacs Eszter with the law conditions? How do you intend to settle the breachment occurred between the appointment and the legal conditions? In this respect what is the content of dr. Takács Eszter's declaration required by the law ?
Our second public question is:
How the "constitutional duties" and independence will be met with dubious appointment of dr. Takács Eszter as a judge who comes from the state administration(Land Office) with disputable and controversial background and who is associated with illegal acts, i.e. Land Office act no. 30153-8/2006 written and signed by her? With this act null and void agreements were declared as valid and registrable documents by dr. Takács Eszter. She has conducted and upheld the illegal land registration procedure for years in spite and after she knew from the Land Office act no. 31544/5/2009 that her procedure is illegal? In the Penalty Act (Btk.) if one either states false facts as true in official document or supresses significant facts and uphelds these against her right knowledge about the real facts - that person exhausts the case of forgery(document).
Our third public question is:
Who and how will guarrantee the "fulfilment of constitutional duties" and the "high quality judgements" in case of dr. Takács Eszter?
How the people could trust in such a judge and her judgements? How the public trust was affected by apponting dr. Takács Eszter as judge?
